Resolutions, Honestly
|
New Year's Day now is the accepted time to make your regular
annual good resolutions. Next week you can begin paving hell with them as usual
~ Mark Twain
It’s
2013. Lot of resolutions have been made:
"this year I’ll exercise more, eat better, be more patient, etc…" Yet as behavioral economists we know that
most resolutions won’t be
kept. Those resolutions that are honored
are usually simple and straightforward – goals that would have been achieved
even if not articulated.
In my
experience behavioral economists are some of the worst resolution-keepers. I won’t cast stones, as I’m in a glass house
of my own construction. Remember our
weekly newsletter? That’s right, the one
that comes every two weeks? Or sometimes
every four weeks?… Despite heroic weekly
efforts, we’re not weekly newsletter goal-achievers.
So we set
about to get it right this year. Why is
the resolution failure rate so high, even by "professionals" who design behavioral
guides like this one?
What can we honestly do to make sure our newsletter is published weekly? As we dug into this, we realized we had
entered a vault in the collective unconscious.
Resolutions aren’t what we think they are.
Scheduling a Donation to Communist Insurgents
|
Good
resolutions are simply checks that men draw on a bank where they have no
account.
~ Oscar Wilde
~ Oscar Wilde
Before we
jump into the unconscious side of resolutions, we would be remiss not to
mention the one conscious technique – an excruciatingly painful one - for virtually
guaranteeing success in completing a New Year’s resolution. This tool is so painful that few people actually
commit to it.
Researchers
have found that goal-compliance is dramatically improved if one places a PAINFULLY
LARGE amount of money or valuables in escrow for delivery to a hated cause in
case of failure. For example, if you value
social tolerance, then in case of
failure in achieving your resolution you would donate $100,000 to Terry Jones
(the Koran-burning preacher in Florida) or, perhaps, the Neo-Nazi party. If you value liberty, then, in case your goal is not reached, you might commit
to donate $100,000 to the Worker’s Party, the North Korean mission, or supporters
of your least-favorite despot. When money is committed to a despised charity
in case of failure, the goal-achievement rate rises to 80%.
Yet many
people will not take such an extreme
route because there is a risk of failure – what if you were hit by a bus? The money would be released - and the release
of those funds would be too painful to bear.
Short of committing
money to communist, fascist, or religious despots, how can we motivate
ourselves to achieve goals?
In today’s
newsletter we’ll look at unconscious
lessons for how to achieve resolutions.
We’ll examine some of the stock winners and losers in various sentiment
categories from social media. We also
take stock of our 2012 predictions and make a few predictions for 2013.
Our Trading Recap of
2012
|
Sentiment tends to dominate short-term trading patterns. Throughout 2012 we made 30 one-week and medium-term
predictions in our prior newsletters using sentiment as a guide. Overall our predictions were quite accurate,
with more than 70% directional accuracy
and an average return of 5% per trade. Source
data available upon request.
Fundamentals
and information flow
tends to drive longer-term
investment opportunities. In our final
newsletter of 2011, we created a model for longer-term (yearly) forecasts based
on sentiment. A few weeks ago I selectively
noticed that several of the stocks were winners – and touted them in this newsletter
- but didn’t check up on what turned out to be the big losers. While we heavily disclaimed the list as both
"(SEE DISCLAIMER - DO NOT TRADE THESE),” “(and NOT
TRADEWORTHY, AM I CLEAR?)"
and followed the list with, "Many of these were totally
unexpected (verging on psychologically disturbing) stock predictions," on average the forecasts were stinkers.
I’d like to make the
same disclaimer on our 2013 names – again these are longer-term forecasts for
which we do not have enough data to establish statistical significance. They are NOT TRADEWORTHY. But they are interesting as you can see below. We are no longer using the composite
sentiment variable used previously, but instead focusing on social media
conversations about good versus bad accounting which taken together comprise our
single most predictive variable for annual individual equities samples, FundamentalStrength.
Sectors for 2013
|
Last year we
found that our variable FundamentalStrength
(accounting-related sentiment) was the most predictive MarketPsych index for
individual stocks. Over the prior 13
years the top decile of individual tickers for that variable in Year 1 outperformed
the S&P 500 by 14% in Year 2, while the lowest decile underperformed the
SP500 by -5% in Year 2.
While that
study was done on individual tickers, we will first take a look at
sectors. Over 2012 home builders, real
estate, and building and construction were ranked the highest in fundamental
strength, and based on our simple study, they are more likely to outperform the
SP500 in 2013. Energy and
(particularly oil) stocks were lowest in FundamentalStrength for 2012. By the end of 2013 we project that real
estate-related ETFs (IYR and XHB) will outperform oil-dominated ETFs (XLE and
OIH).
FundamentalStrength in
2013
|
For
individual stocks we will have extensive rankings on our website later this
month, but for now I‘ll list some highlights.
The stocks with the highest FundamentalStrength as discussed in
financial social media in 2012 include:
1. Netsuite (N),
2. JPMorgan (JPM),
3. USG Corporation (USG)
4. Alaska Communications (ALSK), and
5. Carrizo Oil & Gas (CRZO).
1. Netsuite (N),
2. JPMorgan (JPM),
3. USG Corporation (USG)
4. Alaska Communications (ALSK), and
5. Carrizo Oil & Gas (CRZO).
The lowest FundamentalStrength
group (most negative perceptions) includes:
1. Lam Research (LCRX),
2. Schlumberger (SLB),
3. Cummins (CMI),
4. Blue Nile (BLUE), and
5. Pitney-Bowes (PBI).
1. Lam Research (LCRX),
2. Schlumberger (SLB),
3. Cummins (CMI),
4. Blue Nile (BLUE), and
5. Pitney-Bowes (PBI).
Least Trusted Banks
and Least Innovative Tech Companies
|
"The one thing that offends me the
most is when I walk by a bank and see ads trying to convince people to take out
second mortgages on their home so they can go on vacation. That's approaching
evil."
~ Jeff Bezos
~ Jeff Bezos
For banks we
see Citizens Republic Bancorp (CRBC) as the most trusted bank. JP Morgan
was the least trusted bank of 2012
due to both the “London Whale” and Libor scandals. PNC Financial Services (PNC) was just above
JPM in the trust rankings (that’s not a compliment).
One of the technology
companies with the highest Innovation
Perceptions of 2012 is Triquint Semiconductor (TQNT), while one of the
lowest Innovation Perceptions technology companies is Telefónica, S.A. /Telef
(TEF), the premiere and incredibly slow Latin American telecommunications
service provider. No surprise about Telefonica
if you’ve ever tried (and repeatedly failed)
to connect to the internet in Spain or Latin America.
We’ll publish
the complete list for 2012 on our website in 2 weeks. But now, back to resolutions…
Keeping
Resolutions: An Unconscious
Perspective
|
Ah, the
unconscious. The unconscious is what
drives national church
leaders to become addicted to
crystal Meth and covertly gay Senators to publicly
denounce homosexuality on the floor
of the Senate. And in our case, we will
use the unconscious to our benefit. To
create a resolution that leverages your unconscious, it doesn’t have to be do-able.
The two rules for keeping a resolution are to make the goal something
you:
1) truly and desperately want to do (desirable), and
2) would be horribly upset if you didn’t do.
To get
anything, you’ve got to both deeply want
it and desperately not want to be
without it. Wanting something creates
a biological squirt of dopamine in your brain’s reward system. This squirt increases your confidence, energy
level, and excitement towards goal-achievement.
But some days you feel grumpy, busy, or burned out, and it will be
difficult to muster the enthusiasm. On those days you need to remember the
aversive consequences of not doing it (the punishment), which is negatively
motivating – it creates a dread
sensation that motivates you towards your goal in order to avoid the bad
outcome.
Remember, we
can change how we think. You may love
chocolate cake and shovel it in your mouth at every opportunity, but if you are
trying to lose weight, this behavior has to stop. So you can try to avoid chocolate cake, but
that’s not a permanent solution.
Ultimately you’ve got to think and feel yourself into 1) despising
chocolate cake, and 2) loving a healthier alternative (a sugar-free coconut-almond
pastry, for example). How could you
possibly despise chocolate cake? Look up
pictures of arteries filled with atherosclerotic plaques on the internet, then
imagine those in your favorite relative who died too early of a stroke or heart
attack. Truth be told, I swore off high fructose corn syrup and
trans fats during a medical school anatomy class. During the human dissection I reached into my
cadaver’s abdomen to identify the aorta.
As I squeezed it, I felt it crunch
between my fingers. That was
disease. Her aorta was full of calcified fat deposits, likely
deposited secondary to trans-fat related inflammation and the build-up of fat
from excess high-fructose corn syrup consumption. It was such deposits which had ultimately broken
free to cause the stroke that killed her.
I thought of her children, left without their mother. And I felt viscerally, "not me, no more junk food." Coca-Cola didn’t taste sweet anymore, and I
didn’t enjoy it. Mine is an extreme
example, but it worked.
1.
Remind
yourself of who you DON’T want to be under any circumstances.
2.
Then
remind yourself of who you DO want to be and how satisfying it will be to
succeed.
Mental Exercise: Setting Up a Doable Resolution
|
If you have
trouble keeping your New Year’s resolutions, then take minute to look inside
yourself and communicate with your unconscious.
Ask yourself these two questions about a resolution:
1.
How awesome will my life be when I complete this goal? (Think BIG, grandiose downstream implications).
______________________________________________________
2. Why would I feel a horrible burning hole of loss if I didn’t complete this resolution in 2013? (If you can’t answer why, then it won’t stick, so try harder)
______________________________________________________
If nothing meets
those criteria, then 1) You’re off the hook, you don’t need any resolutions but
more likely, 2) You should alter your thinking and feeling about the resolution.
There is data to make every bad habit of
ours appear intensely appalling. Take TV
watching – do you want to watch less? If
so, consider that every hour of TV-watching decreases your lifespan by 22 minutes according to this
study. This research is distorted, but
nonetheless, it’s motivating. Every time
you sit in front of a TV, you may be reducing your lifespan to before your
granddaughter’s high school graduation.
She’s going to miss you...
If you have
trouble with resolutions, then the above is the key to keeping them. Define
why it must happen – both the intense benefits and the adverse
consequences. Make your understanding of
the benefits and adverse consequences so intense that you MUST follow through. Otherwise, the new behavior won’t be
prioritized.
Last Week’s Trading
Recap
|
As noted above, our
short-term trading results were impressive in 2012.
Trading recap from last
newsletter: Last newsletter’s one-week buy on Decker Outdoors (DECK), maker of Ugg
boots, paid off as the stock rose 10% over the week. The one-week short on the Chinese ADR Trina Solar (TSL) was volatile but
ended the week in our favor, down 3%.
Week ahead: We have a one-week short on the Solar ETF (TAN). We have a one-week buy on Nike (NKE). (See Disclaimer).
Housekeeping and
Closing
|
We launched the Thomson Reuters MarketPsych Indices for monitoring market psychology for
30 currencies, 50 commodities, 120 countries, and 40 equity sectors and
industries in social and news media.
We have a number of Spring 2013 speaking engagements in New
York, London, Toronto, and Boston – we will provide locations and venues as the
dates come closer.
We love to chat with our readers about their experience with
psychology in the markets - we look forward to hearing from you! We especially love interesting stories or
your or others experiences.
We have speaking
and training availability. Please contact Derek Sweeney at
the Sweeney Agency
to book us: [email protected], +1-866-727-7555
Happy Investing!
Richard L. Peterson, M.D. and The
MarketPsych Team
Books
Both books named "Top Financial Books of the Year" by Kiplingers.
Both books named "Top Financial Books of the Year" by Kiplingers.
No comments:
Post a Comment